
|
Croatia: Housing rights and employment still preventing durable solutions
/4FD2C572C693BB26C1257624003F1763/$file/croatia_cp_sep09.jpg) An IDP returnee in front of his destroyed house in Knin, 1997. Some 2,400 IDPs in Croatia are still unable to return to their place of origin (Photo: UN Photo/Eric Kanalstein, 1997).
|
|
Download pdf version (298 KB)
31 December 2009
Between 1991 and 1995, 220,000 ethnic Croats and subsequently up to 300,000 ethnic Serbs were displaced by armed conflict in Croatia. Since then almost all the Croat IDPs have returned to their homes, while most of the displaced Serbs have resettled in Serbia or in the majority-Serb Danube region of Croatia. In June 2009, 2,400 people remained displaced in Croatia, two thirds of them ethnic Serbs in the Danube region, and their numbers continued to fall slowly as a result of property restitution or reconstruction. Since the end of the conflict, only one third of Croatian Serb IDPs and refugees have been able to return, and in the first half of 2009 only 95 IDPs returned, mostly ethnic Croats. It is estimated that only half of returns have proved sustainable; the main obstacles to minority returns have been the failure to punish perpetrators of war crimes, to restitute people’s former occupancy rights or provide compensation, and also the difficulties they have faced in rebuilding livelihoods.
Contrary to the practice in other Balkan countries, Croatia refused to allow restitution of flats held under occupancy rights, and former holders of such rights are only entitled to limited and delayed benefits from a housing care scheme. Only a minority of nearly 14,000 people who have claimed housing care have been successful.
The national authorities have made progress since 2000, under European Union pressure. They have adopted legislation ensuring participation of people in a minority situation, restitution of property and reconstruction of destroyed properties, and have reviewed cases involving Serbs arrested or convicted for war crimes. However, implementation has been slow due to the complexity of the legal framework and the discriminatory attitude of administrative and judicial bodies.
The number of internally displaced people (IDPs) in Croatia has fallen significantly since the armed conflict between the Croat majority and the Serb minority ended in 1995. At the end of the war, around 250,000 people were displaced within Croatia, of whom 32,000 were Croatian Serbs. By June 2009, the number of IDPs had fallen to about 2,400, includ-ing over 1,600 ethnic Serbs.
The outcome for the two groups of IDPs has been quite different. In 1995, there were three times more Croat IDPs than Croatian Serb IDPs, but by 2009 the situation has been re-versed with twice as many Croatian Serbs as Croats still displaced. As of June 2009, over 220,000 Croat IDPs and some 23,000 Serb IDPs had returned. However almost half of Serb returns to and within Croatia are not sustainable, according to international organisations and NGOs. For the remaining Croat IDPs, the main obstacle to return is the poor economic situation in return areas, whereas ethnic Serb IDPs also face continuing discrimination in accessing housing, property and employment.
Although successive governments have made significant progress since 2000 in reforming and adopting laws to support the return of ethnic Serb IDPs, their implementation has been slow due to their complexity and the discriminatory attitude of administrative bodies. One continuing barrier has been the absence of a remedy for the arbitrary cancellation of ten-ancy rights for former occupiers of socially-owned apartments; this has mainly affected ethnic Serbs. Alternative housing options have been made available to those who wish to return, but others have been left without any durable housing solutions or compensation for the loss of their tenancy right.
Over the past three years the number of IDPs in Croatia has remained steady, indicating that the remaining few have been unable to resolve their status by returning to their place of origin or integrating locally. To enable them to find durable solutions it would be necessary to combine economic support to the most vulnerable, fair compensation for former holders of occupancy rights, and an effective monitoring system to ensure minority rights are up-held. (...)
Download full Overview (661 KB)
1st September 2009
|
| Overview: |
Croatia: Housing rights and employment still preventing durable solutions (1 September 2009) HTML | PDF |
Internal Displacement Profile
"Causes and Background","General"
"Population Figures and Profile","Global figures","Disaggregated data"
"Patterns of Displacement","General"
"Physical Security & Freedom of Movement","General"
"Subsistence Needs","Access to utilities","Shelter","Vulnerable groups"
"Subsistence Needs","Access to utilities","Shelter","Vulnerable groups","Health"
"Access to Education","General","Obstacles to education"
"Issues of Self-Reliance and Public Participation","Self-reliance","Participation"
"Documentation Needs and Citizenship","Documentation","Legal status of minorities","Citizenship"
"Issues of Family Unity, Identity and Culture","General"
"Property Issues","General","Law and policy","Restitution of private property","Socially-owned apartments","Reconstruction"
"Patterns of Return and Resettlement","General","Return movements","Policy","Obstacles to return and resettlement"
"National and International Responses","National response","International response","Policy and recommendations","Reference to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement"
Previous Profile updates
|
|
|