
|
Turkey: Need for continued improvement in response to protracted displacement
/87F2678DE480548FC125765B002EFB5C/$file/tur_cp_oct09.jpg) Returnees in Tatvan, Bitlis Province. IDMC, June 2009
|
|
Download pdf version (326 kb)
31 December 2008
Around a million people became displaced from towns and villages in south-eastern Turkey during the 1980s and 1990s as a result of the insurgent actions of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and the counter-insurgency policies of the Turkish government. Over 60 per cent were forced from their homes between 1991 and 1996. The conflict has abated since 1999, but low-level violence between the PKK and security forces, which may have led to further displacement, continued in 2007 and 2008.
In 2005, 75 per cent of IDPs were found in urban centres, both within affected provinces and elsewhere in Turkey. Most were in 2008 living on the edges of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and Adana, and in cities in the south-east such as Batman, Diyarbakir, Hakkari and Van. IDPs had settled among the urban poor, sharing with other migrants the problems of acute social and economic marginalisation and limited access to housing, schools and health facilities.
It is not clear whether IDPs, who are mainly of Kurdish origin, face specific forms of discrimination, but they do lack access to government programmes which target poor segments of the population and do not take into account the specific needs related to their displacement. Problems which IDPs have particularly identified include prevalent psychological and emotional trauma, low levels of education, and high unemployment among adults and particularly among displaced women. Displaced children have also had limited access to schooling, and child labour is reported as a problem in urban centres with significant displaced populations.
Most IDPs have not returned to their areas of origin, due to security concerns involving the continuing presence of mines and local militias belonging to the government’s “village guard” system, and due to the lack of economic opportunities, social services and basic infrastructure (including clean water, electricity, telephone lines, schools and roads) in rural southeastern Turkey. Others have returned only temporarily, usually in the summer months, commuting between cities and their villages of origin.
The government’s response has evolved steadily. In 1994, it launched the “Return to Village and Rehabilitation Project” to facilitate the return and rehabilitation of IDPs. It passed a special compensation law in 2004, and in 2005 sponsored a comprehensive national survey on migration and displacement. The Van Action Plan, launched in 2006, provided a concrete model for addressing IDPs’ and returnees’ needs at the provincial level.
The government has made important progress in the past four years towards improving the overall national policy, and identifying and facilitating return to places of origin for Turkey’s displaced. However, return programmes have been criticised for the lack of support which they offer to returnees, and in the past for lacking transparency, consistency, consultation and funding. NGOs have called for a government review of the national return programme in consultation with civil society, and commitment to reconciliation and reparation initiatives to address past human rights violations against IDPs.
The government in 2008 had still to formulate a national IDP plan of action, as it had aimed to do based upon the experience of the Van Action Plan. Some NGOs reported that the implementation of the Van Action Plan had progressed slowly for lack of resources. However, in May 2008, the government relaunched the Grand Anatolian Project Plan, an ambitious programme to provide irrigation and basic infrastructure in the south-east, two years after the European Commission underlined the need for a comprehensive plan to address socioeconomic problems there.
Progress for IDPs in Turkey has been influenced by regional and international institutions such as the European Union, European Court of Human Rights and the Council of Europe. The UN’s involvement has centred on the office of the Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of IDPs. If IDPs are to find sustainable solutions, the international community should continue to emphasise the need to address the current situation facing IDPs in urban areas the pervasive obstacles to their return, and encourage wider efforts to seek reconciliation on the Kurdish issue.
Around one million internally displaced people (IDPs) in Turkey continue to face protracted displacement, with many obstacles still standing in the way of durable solutions. Prevailing insecurity in south-eastern Turkey, the continuing presence of village guard militias and of mines, and under-development continue to bar their return. Integration in urban areas is still fraught with difficulties in the absence of targeted assistance, as IDPs, most of them Kurdish, face socio-economic marginalisation and discrimination.
However the government has taken notable steps to address the internal displacement situation. In the last four years, it has commissioned a national survey on the number and conditions of IDPs; drafted a national IDP strategy; adopted a law on compensation; and put together a comprehensive pilot action plan in Van Province which addresses rural and urban situations of displacement. (...)
Download full overview (355 Kb)
26 October 2009
|
| Overview: |
Need for continued improvement in response to protracted displacement (26 October 2009) HTML | PDF |
Internal Displacement Profile
"Causes and Background","Background","Causes of displacement","Other causes of displacement"
"Population Figures and Profile","Global figures","Geographical Distribution"
"Patterns of Displacement","General"
"Physical Security & Freedom of Movement","Physical security","Women","Children and adolescents","Freedom of movement","Other concerns"
"Subsistence Needs","General","Health","Shelter"
"Access to Education","General"
"Issues of Self-Reliance and Public Participation","Self-reliance"
"Documentation Needs and Citizenship","Documentation needs"
"Issues of Family Unity, Identity and Culture","General","Culture"
"Property Issues","General","National Property Compensation Law","European Court of Human Rights"
"Patterns of Return and Resettlement","Return movements","Figures on Return","Policy","Return and resettlement programmes","Obstacles to return and resettlement"
"National and International Responses","National and international response","Legal framework and national policy","Policy and recommendations from international actors","Policy and Recommendations from european actors","Policy and Recommendations from Turkish civil soceity","References to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement"
Previous Profile updates
|
- Key Documents
- Report by Thomas Hammarberg Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Following his visit to Turkey on 28 June – 3 July 2009, Council of Europe (COE), Commissioner for Human Rights, October 2009
- Comments of the Republic of Turkey on the Report regarding "Human Rights of Minorities" by Mr. T. Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe following his visit to Turkey (28 June - 3 July 2009), Government of Turkey, October 2009
- Permanent Solution to Internal Displacement? An Assessment of the Van Action Plan for IDPs, Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV), May 2009
- National and Regional Laws and Policies on Internal Displacement - Turkey, Brookings-Bern Project on Internal Displacement, 2009
- Support to the Development of an IDP Programme in Turkey: Additional Component for the Sustainability and Scale up of the Pilot Activity Carried Out in Van Province, August 2008 - September 2009, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), August 2008
- Coming to Terms with Forced Migration: Post Displacement Restitution of Citizenship Rights in Turkey, TESEV, 30 August 2007
- Van Province Action Plan for the IDPs Service Delivery, Governorate of Van, Republic of Turkey, September 2006
|
|