
|
Philippines: IDP return still hampered by insecurity and lack of assistance
/A8C8F3D83496AC6FC125775000465A9C/$file/phil_cp_jun2010.jpg) The DGPC Elementary School in Datu Piang, Maguindanao, has been used as an evacuation center since the third week of August 2008 (IDMC, May 2009).
|
|
Download pdf version (205 kb)
31 December 2009
Conflict and displacement have been ongoing for at least 30 years in the Philippines. Most recently, in August 2008, renewed fighting between the government and rebels of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in the southern region of Mindanao led to the internal displacement of an estimated one million people, before the parties declared a ceasefire in July 2009.
Before this latest surge in fighting, it was estimated that more than two million people across the country had been displaced due to conflict since 2000. Most displacement had taken place in Mindanao; however, it had also been caused by armed encounters throughout the country between the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the communist rebel group of the NPA, and by operations against the Abu Sayyaf group in Basilan and Sulu Provinces.
During 2009, the Mindanao conflict was largely concentrated in the majority-Muslim provinces of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), and particularly in Maguindanao Province. There, decades of conflict, displacement, poor governance and development neglect have kept the majority of the population in poverty, with limited access to personal safety or to basic social services.
Low-intensity conflict between the government and the MILF in the early months of the year caused only sporadic and limited displacement, but prevented many people displaced in previous months from returning home. From April onwards the government stepped up its military response, in particular in Maguindanao province where army operations caused massive displacement. Formal peace talks resumed at the end of the year, at which point up to 188,000 people were still displaced in the absence of security guarantees and sufficient assistance.
IDPs have faced many threats to their physical security and integrity, while facing barriers to their enjoyment of the basic necessities of life, education, property, livelihoods and other rights. The common agent of displacement nationwide has been the AFP and its operations against the different insurgencies. Civilians living near areas of fighting have been at risk from shelling and aerial bombardment, including after their displacement. During counter-insurgency operations by the AFP, people have reportedly been harassed, abducted and sometimes killed. In areas known as MILF rebel strongholds, the AFP has come to openly consider IDPs as the “enemy reserve force”.
At the end of 2009, IDPs were either gathered in camps, where they were receiving some national and international support, or dispersed and possibly receiving support from host communities. Many had been living in displacement for 18 months. Away from their farm lands or traditional livelihoods, most IDPs had resorted to daily labour, petty trade and fishing, activities which generated far less income and did not significantly improve their access to food or other basic necessities. Displaced children, many of whom had had their education interrupted by their displacement, were vulnerable to trafficking, recruitment into armed groups, malnutrition and health problems due to their prolonged stay in overcrowded emergency centres.
While the government has generally acknowledged the internal displacement situation, its scale and impact have been insufficiently documented and often played down. The government has so far failed to provide a comprehensive response to the specific problems which IDPs face. Most efforts have gone into providing emergency humanitarian assistance, but have not ensured that the returns which have taken place are safe or offer sustainable livelihood opportunities, or that alternative durable solutions are offered when return is not an option.
The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) has been the main agency delivering assistance to IDPs, either directly or through other agencies. Coordination, both between government agencies and between them and humanitarian agencies, is largely driven from Manila and has been reported as inadequate. Local NGOs, volunteers and other representatives of civil society, including IDPs themselves, have played a critical role in assisting the internally displaced and in advocating for their rights in Mindanao and elsewhere in the country; nonetheless, many IDPs have relied on the humanitarian assistance provided by international NGOs and agencies such as WFP, IOM or UNDP in the absence of sufficient government assistance.
The absence of a permanent Resident Coordinator to head the UN country team during the conflict period hampered the UN’s humanitarian response. It took more than a year from August 2008 for an IASC protection cluster to be established at the national level. In Mindanao, the Monitoring Working Group (MWG) established in February was replaced six months later by the Protection Working Group (PWG) led by IOM.
Up to 3,500 families displaced by fighting between Mindanao rebels
(13 August 2010)
Fighting between rival commanders of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in early August forced up to 3,500 families to flee their homes near the municipality of Datu Piang, in Maguindanao province of the southern region of Mindanao. Clan violence is increasing in Maguindanao: according to IOM, an estimated 25,000 people have fled their homes in the last two months due to land disputes and family feuds.
The violence poses a serious threat to the current peace process between the government and the MILF. After the army intervened in the latest fighting, the MILF protested to the joint Coordinating Committee on the Cessation of Hostilities against what it considered as a violation of the ceasefire. According to the army, the military intervention was necessary to separate the warring parties, prevent the violence from spreading to neigbouring areas and protect the people displaced. On August 9, the leader of the MILF warned that the peace talks were at risk due to the new government’s intention to overhaul the negotiations. Up to 18,000 families remain displaced as a result of the August 2008 conflict, most of them living in evacuation centres in Maguindanao.
Nearly a year after a ceasefire agreement between the government and the rebels of the Muslim Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) put an end to renewed fighting in the southern island of Mindanao, some 26,000 families remain displaced in June 2010. The renewed conflict, ignited by the failure of a land deal in August 2008, had led to the displacement of up to a million people by July 2009. The majority of the remaining internally displaced people (IDPs) are living in 67 evacuation centres in Maguindanao Province, while a smaller number are living in relocation and resettlement sites or with relatives. With the exception of North Cotabato Province, where an estimated 1,800 families are still displaced, people displaced by the conflict in other provinces have now returned home, although thousands remain displaced due to clan-related violence, or rido, which has been the main cause of displacement since July 2009. (...)
Download full Overview (262 kb)
28 June 2010
|
| Overview: |
IDP return still hampered by insecurity and lack of assistance (28 June 2010) HTML | PDF |
| Special Country Report: |
Cycle of conflict and neglect: Mindanao’s displacement and protection crisis (9 October 2009) HTML | PDF |
Internal Displacement Profile
"Causes and Background","Background","Causes of displacement"
"IDP Population Figures","Number of IDPs","Location (s) of IDP populations","IDP Demographic structure"
"IDP Population Movements and Patterns","Population movements","Patterns of movement"
"Physical Security and Integrity","Physical security","dignity","mental and moral integrity","Liberty and freedom of movement"
"Basic Necessities of Life","General","Food and water","Shelter and housing","Medical care and sanitation"
"Property, Livelihoods, Education and Other Economic, Social and Cultural Rights","Land and Property","Primary education and educational programmes","Work and livelihood opportunities and coping strategies","Other economic","social and cultural rights"
"Family Life, Participation, Access to Justice and Other Civil and Political Rights","Access to justice"
"Protection of Special Categories of IDPs (Age, Gender, Diversity)","Gender - Women and Men","Boys","girls and adolescents","Indigenous peoples","minorities","peasants","pastoralists and other groups with a special dependency on and attachment to their lands"
"Durable Solutions (Return, Local Integration, Settlement Elsewhere in the Country)","Documented returns","settled locally and settled elsewhere","Prospects for and obstacles to voluntary return","local settlement and settlement elsewhere","Support for return integration and reintegration"
"National and International Response","International human rights and humanitarian law framework including references to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement","National Response","Humanitarian access and assistance","International Response"
Previous Profile updates
|
- Key Documents
- Shattered Lives: Beyond the 2009-2009 Mindanao armed conflict, AI, 25 August 2009
- WASH Cluster Rapid Assessment - Communities in Central Mindanao, Philippines WASH cluster, August 2009
- NDCC Update, Sitrep No 86, Complex emergency in Mindanao, National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC), 14 July 2009
- European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2009 on the Philippines, European Parliament, 12 March 2009
- The Philippines: Running in Place in Mindanao, ICG, 16 February 2009
- Shattered peace in Mindanao: the human cost of conflict in the Philippines, AI, 29 October 2008
- Initial Needs Assessment Mission to Mindanao, 4-5 and 7-10 September 2008, IASC Country Team in the Philippine, 13 September 2008
|
|