
|
Turkey: Need for continued improvement in response to protracted displacement
/87F2678DE480548FC125765B002EFB5C/$file/tur_cp_oct09.jpg) Returnees in Tatvan, Bitlis Province. IDMC, June 2009
|
|
Download pdf version
31 December 2010
During the past 25 years, the Turkish armed forces have engaged in conflict with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in the south-eastern provinces of the country. A policy of burning down villages to prevent them from being used as PKK bases, as well as indiscriminate attacks against civilians by both parties, led to the internal displacement of between 954,000 and 1.2 million people during the 1980s and 1990s, the majority of whom were displaced between 1991 and 1996. Though the south-east has become more secure, fighting has continued sporadically since 2004. In August 2010, the PKK declared a unilateral ceasefire which was subsequently extended until 2011; however this was the seventh such ceasefire, and the government has disregarded them all.
In 2010, most IDPs were living on the edges of cities, both within affected provinces (for example in Batman, Diyarbakir, Hakkari and Van) and elsewhere in Turkey (in Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir). They had settled among the urban poor with whom they shared limited access to housing, education and health care; for those outside the south-east this was compounded by discrimination and acute social and economic marginalisation. Problems particularly identified among forcibly displaced communities included trauma, limited access to education, and high levels of unemployment, particularly among women. Child labour and domestic violence were reported to be increasing in urban centres.
The vast majority of IDPs are Kurdish, and their displacement and current situation is tied to the government’s failure to recognise the Kurdish identity. In the last few years, the government has taken a number of unprecedented steps towards a “democratic opening” to address the Kurdish issue, including steps which could have significant bearing on the response to displacement. Human rights associations have nevertheless condemned continued discrimination and the use of existing legislation to stifle freedoms; they have called repeatedly for human rights violations against Kurds to be addressed and for state agents who have perpetrated them, many of them members of government “village guard” militias, to be punished.
Relatively few IDPs have returned to their places of origin; in July 2009, the government reported that only a little over 150,000 people had returned. Others have commuted between cities and their villages of origin. The intermittent insecurity has discouraged returns and even threatened new displacement, and people have been discouraged by the continuing presence of village guard militias and of close to a million landmines in the provinces bordering Syria and Iraq. IDPs areas of origin also have fewer economic opportunities, social services and basic infrastructure.
The government has taken significant steps to respond to the displacement, with an emphasis on support for returns. In 1994, it launched the Return to Village and Rehabilitation Project, and from 2006 it commissioned a national survey of the number and situation of IDPs, drafted a national IDP strategy, adopted a law on compensation and launched a comprehensive programme in Van Province to address rural and urban situations of displacement. It started in 2009 to draw up plans for 13 other provinces affected by displacement, based on the Van pilot plan. These provincial action plans are intended to form the basis of a comprehensive national response.
The provincial action plans being developed in 2010 included stronger measures to support settlement options other than return for IDPs in the affected governorates. However, civil society observers continued to voice concerns over the continuing situation of IDPs. They have criticised programmes for the lack of support which they offer to returnees, and for their lack of transparency, consultation, consistency, and adequate funding. The pilot action plan in Van has been criticised for failing to acknowledge the underlying Kurdish issue and the insecurity in areas of return, while the other provincial plans will not address the situation of IDPs in cities outside the south-east.
Progress for IDPs in Turkey has been influenced by regional institutions such as the EU, the European Court of Human Rights and the Council of Europe. In his most recent report in 2009, the Council of Europe's Commissioner for Human Rights underlined the need for a comprehensive plan to address the socio-economic problems faced by IDPs and to ensure “sustainable durable solutions”. This was reiterated in the EU’s annual progress report in 2010 which also highlighted the need to address the situation of urban IDPs and to resolve the obstacles to sustainable return. If IDPs are to achieve durable solutions, the international community should continue to raise these concerns, and encourage wider efforts at reconciliation.
Around one million internally displaced people (IDPs) in Turkey continue to face protracted displacement, with many obstacles still standing in the way of durable solutions. Prevailing insecurity in south-eastern Turkey, the continuing presence of village guard militias and of mines, and under-development continue to bar their return. Integration in urban areas is still fraught with difficulties in the absence of targeted assistance, as IDPs, most of them Kurdish, face socio-economic marginalisation and discrimination.
However the government has taken notable steps to address the internal displacement situation. In the last four years, it has commissioned a national survey on the number and conditions of IDPs; drafted a national IDP strategy; adopted a law on compensation; and put together a comprehensive pilot action plan in Van Province which addresses rural and urban situations of displacement. (...)
Download full overview (355 Kb)
26 October 2009
|
| Overview: |
Principle versus practice: Poverty and discrimination as barriers to the enjoyment of the right to education for internally displaced children (31 August 2010) HTML | PDF |
| Case study: |
Principle versus practice: Poverty and discrimination as barriers to the enjoyment of the right to education for internally displaced children (31 August 2010) HTML | PDF |
Internal Displacement Profile
"Causes and Background","Background","Causes of displacement","Other causes of displacement"
"Population Figures and Profile","Global figures","Geographical Distribution"
"Patterns of Displacement","General"
"Physical Security & Freedom of Movement","Physical security","Women","Children and adolescents","Freedom of movement","Other concerns"
"Subsistence Needs","General","Health","Shelter"
"Access to Education","General"
"Issues of Self-Reliance and Public Participation","Self-reliance"
"Documentation Needs and Citizenship","Documentation needs"
"Issues of Family Unity, Identity and Culture","General","Culture"
"Property Issues","General","National Property Compensation Law","European Court of Human Rights"
"Patterns of Return and Resettlement","Return movements","Figures on Return","Policy","Return and resettlement programmes","Obstacles to return and resettlement"
"National and International Responses","National and international response","Legal framework and national policy","Policy and recommendations from international actors","Policy and Recommendations from european actors","Policy and Recommendations from Turkish civil soceity","References to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement"
Previous Profile updates
|
- Key Documents
- Report by Thomas Hammarberg Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Following his visit to Turkey on 28 June – 3 July 2009, Council of Europe (COE), Commissioner for Human Rights, October 2009
- Comments of the Republic of Turkey on the Report regarding "Human Rights of Minorities" by Mr. T. Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe following his visit to Turkey (28 June - 3 July 2009), Government of Turkey, October 2009
- Permanent Solution to Internal Displacement? An Assessment of the Van Action Plan for IDPs, Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV), May 2009
- National and Regional Laws and Policies on Internal Displacement - Turkey, Brookings-Bern Project on Internal Displacement, 2009
- Support to the Development of an IDP Programme in Turkey: Additional Component for the Sustainability and Scale up of the Pilot Activity Carried Out in Van Province, August 2008 - September 2009, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), August 2008
- Coming to Terms with Forced Migration: Post Displacement Restitution of Citizenship Rights in Turkey, TESEV, 30 August 2007
- Van Province Action Plan for the IDPs Service Delivery, Governorate of Van, Republic of Turkey, September 2006
|
|